SharePlusSharePlus
More ▼

Tag: Employment

Businessglobal-economy

Is it OK for jobseekers or employers to use AI?

Recent research reveals that graduates are increasingly relying on artificial intelligence to navigate the competitive job market, sometimes crossing ethical lines to misrepresent themselves. At the same time, employers are also using automated tools to screen applicants, creating a complex digital arms race. While using AI for drafting CVs or cover letters has gained broad acceptance, real-time assistance during video interviews remains controversial. Experts warn that the widespread adoption of AI in hiring is intensifying pressure on jobseekers while raising urgent questions about fairness and authenticity.

Businessstartups

How 'spray and pray' AI job applications can backfire

Recent research reveals that graduates are increasingly relying on artificial intelligence to manage high volumes of job applications, a trend known as 'spray and pray.' While some tools help candidates bypass automated screening systems and cope with grueling market conditions, misuse in interviews and assessments has raised ethical concerns. Employers report a sharp rise in suspected AI misconduct, creating a complex dilemma for both sides. Companies utilize automated filters to screen applicants, yet criticize candidates for over-relying on similar technologies to generate CVs and cover letters, intensifying pressure in a competitive job market.

Technologyai

Fired OpenAI Safety Researchers Dispute Misconduct Claims

Three recently fired OpenAI safety researchers have published an open letter denying allegations that they mishandled sensitive company information. Jasmine Wang, Tomek Korbak, and Mikita Balesni argue that their dismissals are creating a dangerous chilling effect on the company's internal safety culture, instilling fear among current employees. The researchers contend that collaborating with outside experts is a vital safety mechanism essential for identifying and mitigating risks. OpenAI leadership has denied that the firings were retaliatory, maintaining that employees are not terminated for raising safety concerns, while declining to detail specific policy violations.